![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Administrative Law - Enviro](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Bases Du Droit - Droits De](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Bases Du Droit</a>" ) ; </s](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Civil Law</a>" ) ; </script](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Criminal Law</a>" ) ; </scr](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Derecho Civil</a>" ) ; </sc](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Derecho Constitucional</a>"](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Direito Civil</a>" ) ; </sc](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Drept European</a>" ) ; </s](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Drept International Public<](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Dreptul Tehnologiei Informa](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Droit Administratif - Droit](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Droit Administratif</a>" )](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Droit Civil - Contrats Spec](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Droit Civil</a>" ) ; </scri](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Droit Des Assurances</a>" )](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Droit Des Procedures Judici](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Droit Des Technologies De L](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Droit Des Technologies De L](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Droit Des Technologies De L](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Droit Du Travail - Contrat](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Droit Du Travail - Protecti](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Droit Europeen - Institutio](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Droit Europeen</a>" ) ; </s](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Droit International Public<](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Droit Penal</a>" ) ; </scri](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Economic Law - Commercial L](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Europaisches Recht</a>" ) ;](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>European Law - European Ins](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>European Law</a>" ) ; </scr](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Foundations Of The Law - Hi](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Hide details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Foundations Of The Law - Hu](/icons/collapse.gif) |  |
|  | Lithuanian authorities failed to protect 22-year old detainee who was beaten to death by other inmates | In its Chamber judgment in the case Česnulevičius v. Lithuania, which is not final, the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, a two violations of Article 2 (right to life and lack of effective investigation) of the European Convention on Human Rights concerning the death of Mr Česnulevičius’ son as well as the authorities’ failure to adequately investigate his death. The case concerned the death of Mr Česnulevičius’ 22-year old son in August 2000 inravieniškės Prison following repeated attacks by other inmates | | Published in 10-01-2012 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
|  |
 |  | Proceedings before the Latvian courts related to child abduction breached the Convention | In it’s Chamber judgment in the case X v. Latvia , which is not final, the European Court of Human Rights held, by a majority, that there had
been a violation of Article 8(right to protection of family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights. The case concerned the complaint of a mother, X, that the Latvian court order to return X’s daughter to live with her father in Australia breached her family rights.
| | Published in 13-12-2011 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
|  |
|  | Abuse of the right of individual application by a Serbian lawyer filing hundreds of dubious applications with the European Court of Human Rights | In its decision in the case of Petrović v. Serbia (applications nos. 56551/11, 56650/11, 56669/11, 56671/11, 56692/11, 56744/11, 56826/11, 56827/11, 56831/11, 56833/11 and 56834/11),the European Court of Human Rights has unanimously declared the applications inadmissible. The decision is final. The case concerned a lawyer who had lodged before the European Court, either as an applicant or as a legal representative of other applicants, more than 500 applications the majority of which were of a highly suspicious character | | Published in 19-11-2011 by |
|  |
 |  |  |
|  |  |
 |  |  |
|  | Unjustified police intervention in demonstrations | The European Court of Human Rights has notified in writing its Chamber judgment - not final - in the case of Gazioğlu and Others v. Turkey and Akgöl and Göl v. Turkey. Both cases concerned the intervention by the police in demonstrations in which the applicants participated.
The Court held,
- unanimously a violation of Article 11 (freedom of assembly and association) of the European Convention on Human Rights in bth cases and,
- by a majority a violation of Article 3 (pro | | Published in 17-05-2011 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
|  |
 |  | Turkey and Switzerland secured an abducted child’s return, but the child and his father were unlawfully detained in Turkey | The European Court of Human Rights has notified in writing its Chamber judgment - not final - in the case of Küçük v. Turkey and Switzerland. The case concerned the international abduction of a child by his mother. The father complained in his own name and on behalf of his son that Turkey (their country) and Switzerland (where the child had been sighted) had not taken the necessary steps to secure the child’s prompt return. Once the father had eventually recovered the chld, the two were detained for several hours at Esenboğa Airport while travelling back to Turkey | | Published in 17-05-2011 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
|  |
|  | France fails to provide adequate medical care for anorexic prisoner | The European Court of Human Rights has notified in writing its Chamber judgment - not final - in the case of Raffray Taddei v. France. The case concerned the question whether a prisoner suffering from a number of medical conditions including anorexia could be kept in prison despite her state of health, and also whether she received appropriate medical care. The Court held a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Conention on Human Rights | | Published in 21-12-2010 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
|  |
 |  |  |
|  | Inadequate medical assistance to HIV-positive detainees in Ukraine and Russia | The European Court of Human Rights has notified in writing its Chamber judgments in the cases of of Logvinenko v. Ukraine and A.B. v. Russia
The Court held, unanimously, - a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment) of the European Convention on Human Rights , and
- a violation of Article 13 (lack of an effective remedy) of the European Convention on Human Rights in the case of Lovinenko;
- a two violations of Article 3, of the European Convention on Human Right | | Published in 14-10-2010 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
|  |
 |  | Journalists’ conviction for article on private life of presidential candidate’s communications manager not justified | The European Court of Human Rights has notified in writing its Chamber judgment in the case of Saaristo and Others v. Finland . The case concerned the applicants’ conviction and order to pay damages for publishing information about the private life of the communications manager of Esko Aho, one of the presidential candidates during the 2000 election campaign. The Court held , unanimously , a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Conventon on Human Rights | | Published in 12-10-2010 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
|  |
|  | Chamber judgment Y.P. and L.P. v. France | The European Court of Human Rights has notified in writing its Chamber judgment in the case of Y.P. and L.P. v. France . The Court considers that the applicants , member of political opposition , and his family at risk of ill-treatment if removed to Belarus .
The Court held unanimously a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights
if the applicants were removed to Belarus.
| | Published in 02-09-2010 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
|  |
 |  | Detention was incompatible with applicant’s state of health | The European Court of Human Rights has notified in writing its Chamber judgment in the case of Rokosz v. Poland . The Court considers that the detention was incompatible with applicant’s state of health .
The Court held, unanimously, a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights,
| | Published in 27-07-2010 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
|  |
|  | Chamber hearing Atanasiu and Poenaru and Solon v. Romania | The European Court of Human Rights held a Chamber hearing Tuesday 8 June 2010on the admissibility and merits in the cases of Atanasiu and Poenaru v. Romania and Solon v. Romania (application nos. 30767/05 and 33800/06). The hearing is broadcast on the Court’s Internet site (http://www.echr.coe.int).
These applications is lodged with the European Court of Human Rights on 11 August 2005 and 4 August 2006 respectively.
| | Published in 08-06-2010 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
|  |
 |  | Iranian refugee converted to christianity would be at risk of ill-treatment if deported to her home country | The European Court of Human Rights has notified in writing its Chamber judgment in the case of Z.N.S. v. Turkey . The Court considers that the the applicant, a iranian refugee converted to christianity, would be at risk of ill-treatment if deported to her home country. The Court held unanimously :
- applicant’s deportation would be in violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights, and
- aviolation of Article 5 §§ 1 and 4 (right to liberty and security) of the Convention | | Published in 19-01-2010 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
|  |
|  | Cypriot and russian authorities failed to protect 20-year old russian cabaret artiste from human trafficking | The European Court of Human Rights has notified in writing its Chamber judgment in the case of Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia .
The Court held , unanimously:
- a violation of Article 2 (right to life) for failure to conduct effective investigation by Cyprus and no violation of this Article by Russia ,
- a violations of Article 4 (prohibition of slavery and forced labour) by Cyprus and Russia, and
- a violation of Article 5 (right to librty and security) by Cyprus
of the European Convention on Human Rights | | Published in 07-01-2010 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
|  |
 |  | Chamber judgment Merzhoyev v. Russia | The European Court of Human Rights has notified in writing its Chamber judgment in the case of Merzhoyev v. Russia . .
The Court held a no violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) to the European Convention on Human Rights.
| | Published in 08-10-2009 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
|  |
|  | Chamber judgment Kvasnica v. Slovakia | The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing its Chamber judgment in the case of Kvasnica v. Slovakia . The case concerned the interception of Mr Kvasnica’s professional telephone communications in the context of a criminal investigation into the financial activities of a group of companies for which he acted as legal representative.
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life)> of the European Convention on Human Rights, on account of the interception of telephone calls o | | Published in 09-06-2009 by cmiskp.echr.coe.int |
|  |
 |  | Chamber Judgment Houtman and Meeus v. Belgium | The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing its Chamber judgment in the case of Houtman and Meeus v. Belgium . The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 5 (enforceable right to compensation) of the European Convention on Human Rights on account of the failure of the Belgian courts to compensate the applicants for Godelieve Houtman’s unlawful confinement in a psychiatric institution. | | Published in 17-03-2009 by European Court of Human Rights |
|  |
|  | FIRST DECISION ON COURT'S COMPETENCE TO GIVE AN ADVISORY OPINION | At a public hearing held today in Strasbourg, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has delivered its decision concerning the first request to the Court for an advisory opinion under Article 471 (advisory opinions) of the European Convention on Human Rights. | | Published in 08-06-2004 by Council of Europe Press Division |
|  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Intellectual Property</a>"](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>It Law - Internet Law</a>"](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Process Of Law</a>" ) ; </s](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Public International Law</a](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Strafrecht</a>" ) ; </scrip](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Volkerrecht</a>" ) ; </scri](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Wirtschaftsrecht - Gesellsc](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Wirtschaftsrecht - Wettbewe](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Zivilrecht - Obligationsrec](/icons/expand.gif) |  |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Zivilrecht</a>" ) ; </scrip](/icons/expand.gif) | |
![Show details for [<script>document.write("<a href='" + document.links[document.links.length-1] + "'>Zzzother</a>" ) ; </script>](/icons/expand.gif) |  |